What Western activists get wrong when they try to save the world.
Advocates of humanitarian intervention – of sending international troops to protect human rights, to provide humanitarian assistance, to prevent atrocities – have ended up merging their agenda with the neocon agenda of projecting US power around the world.
Researcher Alex de Waal points out the blind spots in transnational activism, from uninformed celebrity patrons to misguided consumer-based solutions, and explains why well-meaning liberal outrage so often jumpstarts neoconservative military actions.
Alex edited and wrote for the essay collection Advocacy in Conflict: Critical Perspectives on Transnational Activism from Zed Books.
Guest
Alex de Waal
Alex de Waal is executive director of the World Peace Foundation and a research professor at the Fletcher School at Tufts University.
Related Interviews
Colin Kinniburgh
Feb 13 2020
Climate change is not 'beyond' politics: The problem with Extinction Rebellion's apolitics.
Bram Buscher
Feb 11 2020
On humans, nature and a conservation beyond the domination of global capitalism.
More with Alex de Waal
